Best Known (177−136, 177, s)-Nets in Base 3
(177−136, 177, 42)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (41, 177, 42)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 177, 42)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 41)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 41)-sequence over F3, using
(177−136, 177, 56)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (41, 177, 56)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (40, 177, 56)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
(177−136, 177, 131)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (41, 177, 132)-net in base 3, because
- 58 times m-reduction [i] would yield (41, 119, 132)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3119, 132, S3, 78), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 23379 936017 655610 429125 890884 181024 514039 893587 482992 919339 273663 / 33 418343 > 3119 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3119, 132, S3, 78), but