Best Known (68, 68+137, s)-Nets in Base 3
(68, 68+137, 48)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (68, 205, 48)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 205, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
(68, 68+137, 72)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (68, 205, 72)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (67, 205, 72)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (67, 71)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 67 and N(F) ≥ 72, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (67, 71)-sequence over F3, using
(68, 68+137, 215)-Net over F3 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (68, 205, 216)-net over F3, because
- 2 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (68, 203, 216)-net over F3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(3203, 216, F3, 135) (dual of [216, 13, 136]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- linear OA(3202, 210, F3, 135) (dual of [210, 8, 136]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(367, 74, F3, 45) (dual of [74, 7, 46]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(322, 28, F3, 15) (dual of [28, 6, 16]-code), but
- “HHM†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(322, 28, F3, 15) (dual of [28, 6, 16]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(367, 74, F3, 45) (dual of [74, 7, 46]-code), but
- OA(313, 216, S3, 6), but
- discarding factors would yield OA(313, 107, S3, 6), but
- the Rao or (dual) Hamming bound shows that M ≥ 1 610779 > 313 [i]
- discarding factors would yield OA(313, 107, S3, 6), but
- linear OA(3202, 210, F3, 135) (dual of [210, 8, 136]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(3203, 216, F3, 135) (dual of [216, 13, 136]-code), but
(68, 68+137, 290)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (68, 205, 291)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (68, 204, 291)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 23 824984 473606 983640 329466 377648 844929 779949 730778 322913 853376 411662 002441 358642 313443 142764 174425 > 3204 [i]