Best Known (226−139, 226, s)-Nets in Base 3
(226−139, 226, 62)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (87, 226, 62)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (87, 61)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 61)-sequence over F9, using
- s-reduction based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- s-reduction based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 61)-sequence over F9, using
(226−139, 226, 84)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (87, 226, 84)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (71, 226, 84)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 71 and N(F) ≥ 84, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
(226−139, 226, 412)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (87, 226, 413)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (87, 225, 413)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 251017 265695 505470 913277 822797 283405 650274 462253 319717 046151 263835 822396 480859 313977 476967 219618 156905 503819 > 3225 [i]