Best Known (160−140, 160, s)-Nets in Base 3
(160−140, 160, 28)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 160, 28)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (15, 160, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
(160−140, 160, 32)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (20, 160, 32)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 160, 32)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 31)-sequence over F3, using
(160−140, 160, 50)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 160, 51)-net in base 3, because
- 12 times m-reduction [i] would yield (20, 148, 51)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3148, 51, S3, 3, 128), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 1 849942 425175 634864 623503 912258 483220 932365 501948 614869 075922 026508 741245 / 43 > 3148 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3148, 51, S3, 3, 128), but