Best Known (169−140, 169, s)-Nets in Base 3
(169−140, 169, 37)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 169, 37)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (27, 169, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
(169−140, 169, 42)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (29, 169, 42)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 41)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 29 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
(169−140, 169, 75)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 169, 76)-net in base 3, because
- 23 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 146, 76)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3146, 76, S3, 2, 117), but
- the LP bound with quadratic polynomials shows that M ≥ 616647 475058 544954 874501 304086 161073 644121 833982 871623 025307 342169 580415 / 118 > 3146 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3146, 76, S3, 2, 117), but