Best Known (174−144, 174, s)-Nets in Base 3
(174−144, 174, 37)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 174, 37)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (27, 174, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
(174−144, 174, 42)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (30, 174, 42)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (29, 174, 42)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 41)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 29 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 41)-sequence over F3, using
(174−144, 174, 77)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 174, 78)-net in base 3, because
- 23 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 151, 78)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3151, 78, S3, 2, 121), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 89 907201 863535 854420 702290 135762 284537 312963 394702 682637 089810 488324 824507 / 61 > 3151 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3151, 78, S3, 2, 121), but