Best Known (48, 48+152, s)-Nets in Base 3
(48, 48+152, 48)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 200, 48)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 200, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
(48, 48+152, 56)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (48, 200, 56)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (40, 200, 56)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
(48, 48+152, 153)-Net over F3 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (48, 200, 154)-net over F3, because
- 53 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (48, 147, 154)-net over F3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(3147, 154, F3, 99) (dual of [154, 7, 100]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(3147, 154, F3, 99) (dual of [154, 7, 100]-code), but
(48, 48+152, 156)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 200, 157)-net in base 3, because
- 47 times m-reduction [i] would yield (48, 153, 157)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3153, 157, S3, 105), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound shows that M ≥ 539 443211 181215 126524 213740 814573 707223 877780 368216 095822 538862 929948 947042 / 53 > 3153 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3153, 157, S3, 105), but