Best Known (203−158, 203, s)-Nets in Base 3
(203−158, 203, 48)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (45, 203, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
(203−158, 203, 56)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (45, 203, 56)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (40, 203, 56)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
(203−158, 203, 143)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (45, 203, 144)-net in base 3, because
- 76 times m-reduction [i] would yield (45, 127, 144)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3127, 144, S3, 82), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 13577 961473 879661 811848 237829 138963 029891 906866 238711 650620 748976 085767 / 3257 508055 > 3127 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3127, 144, S3, 82), but