Best Known (199−159, 199, s)-Nets in Base 3
(199−159, 199, 42)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (40, 199, 42)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 199, 42)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 41)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 41)-sequence over F3, using
(199−159, 199, 56)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (40, 199, 56)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
(199−159, 199, 100)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (40, 199, 101)-net in base 3, because
- 2 times m-reduction [i] would yield (40, 197, 101)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3197, 101, S3, 2, 157), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 1 062455 955503 499077 355125 288143 118507 316933 810613 577983 898299 846956 369963 605208 731977 538796 176004 / 79 > 3197 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3197, 101, S3, 2, 157), but