Best Known (228−16, 228, s)-Nets in Base 3
(228−16, 228, 3145725)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (212, 228, 3145725)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (60, 76, 1048575)-net over F27, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2776, 1048575, F27, 16, 16) (dual of [(1048575, 16), 16777124, 17]-NRT-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(2776, 8388600, F27, 16) (dual of [8388600, 8388524, 17]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2776, large, F27, 16) (dual of [large, large−76, 17]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 14348906 = 275−1, defining interval I = [0,15], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 17 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2776, large, F27, 16) (dual of [large, large−76, 17]-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(2776, 8388600, F27, 16) (dual of [8388600, 8388524, 17]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2776, 1048575, F27, 16, 16) (dual of [(1048575, 16), 16777124, 17]-NRT-code), using
(228−16, 228, large)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (212, 228, large)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (209, 228, large)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(3228, large, F3, 19) (dual of [large, large−228, 20]-code), using
- 47 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(3181, large, F3, 19) (dual of [large, large−181, 20]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 14348908 | 330−1, defining interval I = [0,9], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−9,−8,…,9}|+1 = 20 (BCH-bound) [i]
- 47 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(3181, large, F3, 19) (dual of [large, large−181, 20]-code), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(3228, large, F3, 19) (dual of [large, large−228, 20]-code), using
(228−16, 228, large)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (212, 228, large)-net in base 3, because
- 14 times m-reduction [i] would yield (212, 214, large)-net in base 3, but