Best Known (76, 76+170, s)-Nets in Base 3
(76, 76+170, 51)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (76, 246, 51)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (76, 50)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 50)-sequence over F9, using
- s-reduction based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- s-reduction based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 50)-sequence over F9, using
(76, 76+170, 84)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (76, 246, 84)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (71, 246, 84)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 71 and N(F) ≥ 84, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
(76, 76+170, 238)-Net over F3 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (76, 246, 239)-net over F3, because
- 17 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (76, 229, 239)-net over F3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(3229, 239, F3, 153) (dual of [239, 10, 154]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- linear OA(3228, 235, F3, 153) (dual of [235, 7, 154]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(375, 81, F3, 51) (dual of [81, 6, 52]-code), but
- OA(310, 239, S3, 4), but
- discarding factors would yield OA(310, 172, S3, 4), but
- the Rao or (dual) Hamming bound shows that M ≥ 59169 > 310 [i]
- discarding factors would yield OA(310, 172, S3, 4), but
- linear OA(3228, 235, F3, 153) (dual of [235, 7, 154]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(3229, 239, F3, 153) (dual of [239, 10, 154]-code), but
(76, 76+170, 242)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (76, 246, 243)-net in base 3, because
- 8 times m-reduction [i] would yield (76, 238, 243)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3238, 243, S3, 162), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound shows that M ≥ 87 189642 485960 958202 911070 585860 771696 964072 404731 750085 525219 437990 967093 723439 943475 549906 831683 116791 055225 665627 / 163 > 3238 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3238, 243, S3, 162), but