Best Known (46, 46+176, s)-Nets in Base 3
(46, 46+176, 48)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 222, 48)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 222, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
(46, 46+176, 56)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (46, 222, 56)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (40, 222, 56)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
(46, 46+176, 145)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 222, 146)-net in base 3, because
- 89 times m-reduction [i] would yield (46, 133, 146)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3133, 146, S3, 87), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 1497 523208 240534 920642 237582 447721 349397 399972 787749 000691 443934 141439 / 508571 > 3133 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3133, 146, S3, 87), but