Best Known (87−18, 87, s)-Nets in Base 3
(87−18, 87, 464)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (69, 87, 464)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (68, 87, 464)-net over F3, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (68, 88, 464)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 22, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 22, 116)-net over F81, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (68, 88, 464)-net over F3, using
(87−18, 87, 1233)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (69, 87, 1233)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(387, 1233, F3, 18) (dual of [1233, 1146, 19]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(387, 2192, F3, 18) (dual of [2192, 2105, 19]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,9]) ⊂ C([0,7]) [i] based on
- linear OA(385, 2188, F3, 19) (dual of [2188, 2103, 20]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 2188 | 314−1, defining interval I = [0,9], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−9,−8,…,9}|+1 = 20 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(371, 2188, F3, 15) (dual of [2188, 2117, 16]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 2188 | 314−1, defining interval I = [0,7], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−7,−6,…,7}|+1 = 16 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(32, 4, F3, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,3)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,3) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,3) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,3) [i]
- the Tetracode [i]
- construction X applied to C([0,9]) ⊂ C([0,7]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(387, 2192, F3, 18) (dual of [2192, 2105, 19]-code), using
(87−18, 87, 84888)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (69, 87, 84889)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 323266 742129 180802 732171 643969 916551 955091 > 387 [i]