Best Known (227−185, 227, s)-Nets in Base 3
(227−185, 227, 42)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (42, 227, 42)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 227, 42)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 41)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 41)-sequence over F3, using
(227−185, 227, 56)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (42, 227, 56)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (40, 227, 56)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
(227−185, 227, 105)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (42, 227, 106)-net in base 3, because
- 20 times m-reduction [i] would yield (42, 207, 106)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3207, 106, S3, 2, 165), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 78421 202145 657646 273428 491424 453755 923197 030728 651457 964013 384578 658362 476154 963018 177110 469246 075245 / 83 > 3207 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3207, 106, S3, 2, 165), but