Best Known (229−186, 229, s)-Nets in Base 3
(229−186, 229, 42)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (43, 229, 42)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 229, 42)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 41)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 41)-sequence over F3, using
(229−186, 229, 56)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (43, 229, 56)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (40, 229, 56)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
(229−186, 229, 107)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (43, 229, 108)-net in base 3, because
- 19 times m-reduction [i] would yield (43, 210, 108)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3210, 108, S3, 2, 167), but
- the LP bound with quadratic polynomials shows that M ≥ 894001 704460 497167 517084 802238 772817 524446 150306 626620 789752 584196 705332 228166 578407 219059 349405 257793 / 56 > 3210 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3210, 108, S3, 2, 167), but