Best Known (224−194, 224, s)-Nets in Base 3
(224−194, 224, 37)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 224, 37)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (27, 224, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
(224−194, 224, 42)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (30, 224, 42)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (29, 224, 42)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 41)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 29 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 41)-sequence over F3, using
(224−194, 224, 72)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 224, 73)-net in base 3, because
- 10 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 214, 73)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3214, 73, S3, 3, 184), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 354 448149 457943 429626 642095 540246 086021 665939 487358 859705 747695 618620 066719 725201 849556 903898 898410 892351 / 185 > 3214 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3214, 73, S3, 3, 184), but