Best Known (244−200, 244, s)-Nets in Base 3
(244−200, 244, 42)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (44, 244, 42)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 244, 42)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 41)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 41)-sequence over F3, using
(244−200, 244, 56)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (44, 244, 56)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (40, 244, 56)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
(244−200, 244, 109)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (44, 244, 110)-net in base 3, because
- 29 times m-reduction [i] would yield (44, 215, 110)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3215, 110, S3, 2, 171), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 205 808602 911063 926879 985732 894336 437044 838287 444272 886280 756726 488231 006482 421084 944904 008715 489399 872978 / 43 > 3215 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3215, 110, S3, 2, 171), but