Best Known (128−25, 128, s)-Nets in Base 3
(128−25, 128, 688)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (103, 128, 688)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 32, 172)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
(128−25, 128, 2011)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (103, 128, 2011)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3128, 2011, F3, 25) (dual of [2011, 1883, 26]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3128, 2231, F3, 25) (dual of [2231, 2103, 26]-code), using
- 5 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(3123, 2226, F3, 25) (dual of [2226, 2103, 26]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,12]) ⊂ C([0,9]) [i] based on
- linear OA(3113, 2188, F3, 25) (dual of [2188, 2075, 26]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 2188 | 314−1, defining interval I = [0,12], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−12,−11,…,12}|+1 = 26 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(385, 2188, F3, 19) (dual of [2188, 2103, 20]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 2188 | 314−1, defining interval I = [0,9], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−9,−8,…,9}|+1 = 20 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(310, 38, F3, 5) (dual of [38, 28, 6]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(310, 39, F3, 5) (dual of [39, 29, 6]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,12]) ⊂ C([0,9]) [i] based on
- 5 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(3123, 2226, F3, 25) (dual of [2226, 2103, 26]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3128, 2231, F3, 25) (dual of [2231, 2103, 26]-code), using
(128−25, 128, 296379)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (103, 128, 296380)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (103, 127, 296380)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 3 930175 251716 372374 784045 105133 820491 588212 141951 598817 740609 > 3127 [i]