Best Known (90, 90+31, s)-Nets in Base 3
(90, 90+31, 264)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (90, 121, 264)-net over F3, using
- 31 times duplication [i] based on digital (89, 120, 264)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 40, 88)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 87)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 88, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 87)-sequence over F27, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 40, 88)-net over F27, using
(90, 90+31, 525)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (90, 121, 525)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3121, 525, F3, 31) (dual of [525, 404, 32]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3121, 728, F3, 31) (dual of [728, 607, 32]-code), using
(90, 90+31, 21057)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (90, 121, 21058)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (90, 120, 21058)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1797 587211 423437 993691 089376 213409 543283 235030 587568 694681 > 3120 [i]