Best Known (139−35, 139, s)-Nets in Base 3
(139−35, 139, 288)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (104, 139, 288)-net over F3, using
- 31 times duplication [i] based on digital (103, 138, 288)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (11, 46, 96)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (11, 46, 96)-net over F27, using
(139−35, 139, 623)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (104, 139, 623)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3139, 623, F3, 35) (dual of [623, 484, 36]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3139, 728, F3, 35) (dual of [728, 589, 36]-code), using
(139−35, 139, 26776)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (104, 139, 26777)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (104, 138, 26777)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 696531 667044 975433 351873 876045 724129 343603 680793 981612 830794 047987 > 3138 [i]