Best Known (17, 17+39, s)-Nets in Base 3
(17, 17+39, 28)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (17, 56, 28)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (15, 56, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
(17, 17+39, 57)-Net over F3 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (17, 56, 58)-net over F3, because
- 3 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (17, 53, 58)-net over F3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(353, 58, F3, 36) (dual of [58, 5, 37]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(317, 21, F3, 12) (dual of [21, 4, 13]-code), but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(353, 58, F3, 36) (dual of [58, 5, 37]-code), but
(17, 17+39, 60)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (17, 56, 61)-net in base 3, because
- 2 times m-reduction [i] would yield (17, 54, 61)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(354, 61, S3, 37), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 26690 729284 395387 397889 087571 / 437 > 354 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(354, 61, S3, 37), but