Best Known (87−57, 87, s)-Nets in Base 3
(87−57, 87, 37)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 87, 37)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (27, 87, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
(87−57, 87, 42)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (30, 87, 42)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (29, 87, 42)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 41)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 29 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 41)-sequence over F3, using
(87−57, 87, 101)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 87, 102)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 86, 102)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(386, 102, S3, 56), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 229 126665 420746 420271 037058 567775 156188 587579 935531 / 1773 341440 > 386 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(386, 102, S3, 56), but