Best Known (91−61, 91, s)-Nets in Base 3
(91−61, 91, 37)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 91, 37)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (27, 91, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
(91−61, 91, 42)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (30, 91, 42)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (29, 91, 42)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 41)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 29 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 41)-sequence over F3, using
(91−61, 91, 99)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 91, 100)-net in base 3, because
- 3 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 88, 100)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(388, 100, S3, 58), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 19088 056323 407827 075424 486287 615602 692670 648963 / 19057 > 388 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(388, 100, S3, 58), but