Best Known (95−62, 95, s)-Nets in Base 3
(95−62, 95, 38)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 95, 38)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 95, 38)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 37)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 37)-sequence over F3, using
(95−62, 95, 46)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (33, 95, 46)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 45)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 46, using
(95−62, 95, 109)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 95, 110)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 94, 110)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(394, 110, S3, 61), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 9142 281840 265149 001255 783980 912355 756462 685332 775739 / 12 834031 > 394 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(394, 110, S3, 61), but