Best Known (239−65, 239, s)-Nets in Base 3
(239−65, 239, 288)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (174, 239, 288)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (173, 239, 288)-net over F3, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (173, 243, 288)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (11, 81, 96)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (11, 81, 96)-net over F27, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (173, 243, 288)-net over F3, using
(239−65, 239, 720)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (174, 239, 720)-net over F3, using
(239−65, 239, 22585)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (174, 239, 22586)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (174, 238, 22586)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 358925 262364 479588 546142 617831 532902 709726 772079 672083 573091 190055 555502 817059 012102 132885 457227 075527 731325 784897 > 3238 [i]