Best Known (134, 134+65, s)-Nets in Base 3
(134, 134+65, 162)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (134, 199, 162)-net over F3, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (134, 204, 162)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (32, 102, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (32, 102, 81)-net over F9, using
(134, 134+65, 338)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (134, 199, 338)-net over F3, using
(134, 134+65, 5697)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (134, 199, 5698)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (134, 198, 5698)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 29672 100143 060205 264032 977906 130952 582321 418219 875256 309841 106545 451543 676420 379377 737366 264129 > 3198 [i]