Best Known (103−66, 103, s)-Nets in Base 3
(103−66, 103, 38)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (37, 103, 38)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 103, 38)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 37)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 37)-sequence over F3, using
(103−66, 103, 52)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (37, 103, 52)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 51)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 37 and N(F) ≥ 52, using
(103−66, 103, 123)-Net over F3 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (37, 103, 124)-net over F3, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(3103, 124, F3, 66) (dual of [124, 21, 67]-code), but
(103−66, 103, 124)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (37, 103, 125)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (37, 102, 125)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3102, 125, S3, 65), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 82769 748454 520344 172235 733433 653475 678772 427150 151046 492171 / 16360 421572 > 3102 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3102, 125, S3, 65), but