Best Known (145, 145+67, s)-Nets in Base 3
(145, 145+67, 168)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (145, 212, 168)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 44, 20)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 19)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 9, N(F) = 19, and 1 place with degree 3 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 19, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 19)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (101, 168, 148)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 84, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 84, 74)-net over F9, using
- digital (11, 44, 20)-net over F3, using
(145, 145+67, 396)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (145, 212, 396)-net over F3, using
(145, 145+67, 7363)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (145, 212, 7364)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (145, 211, 7364)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 47103 749096 538227 290850 830522 797983 898661 087632 988757 505967 074892 457130 523566 488422 306992 351690 005385 > 3211 [i]