Best Known (236−76, 236, s)-Nets in Base 3
(236−76, 236, 168)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (160, 236, 168)-net over F3, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (160, 237, 168)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 49, 20)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 19)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 9, N(F) = 19, and 1 place with degree 3 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 19, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 19)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (111, 188, 148)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 94, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 94, 74)-net over F9, using
- digital (11, 49, 20)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(236−76, 236, 409)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (160, 236, 409)-net over F3, using
(236−76, 236, 6864)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (160, 236, 6865)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 40055 330468 116367 979092 222836 026763 346025 095633 752085 092034 095617 011380 943521 063292 608645 568916 361250 255989 919097 > 3236 [i]