Best Known (19−8, 19, s)-Nets in Base 3
(19−8, 19, 32)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (11, 19, 32)-net over F3, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (11, 20, 32)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 10, 16)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 15)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 15)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 10, 16)-net over F9, using
(19−8, 19, 37)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (11, 19, 37)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(319, 37, F3, 8) (dual of [37, 18, 9]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(319, 48, F3, 8) (dual of [48, 29, 9]-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OA(37, 24, F3, 4) (dual of [24, 17, 5]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(37, 26, F3, 4) (dual of [26, 19, 5]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 26 = 33−1, defining interval I = [0,2], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 5 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(37, 26, F3, 4) (dual of [26, 19, 5]-code), using
- linear OA(312, 24, F3, 8) (dual of [24, 12, 9]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(24,3) [i]
- linear OA(37, 24, F3, 4) (dual of [24, 17, 5]-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(319, 48, F3, 8) (dual of [48, 29, 9]-code), using
(19−8, 19, 200)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (11, 19, 201)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1165 387281 > 319 [i]