Best Known (160, 160+81, s)-Nets in Base 3
(160, 160+81, 162)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (160, 241, 162)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (157, 241, 162)-net over F3, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (157, 250, 162)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (32, 125, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (32, 125, 81)-net over F9, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (157, 250, 162)-net over F3, using
(160, 160+81, 365)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (160, 241, 365)-net over F3, using
(160, 160+81, 5708)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (160, 241, 5709)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (160, 240, 5709)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 3 246347 193486 533019 348538 698930 516614 825034 708275 438967 409528 312725 938306 868846 772931 225611 306825 620531 235634 510049 > 3240 [i]