Best Known (160−83, 160, s)-Nets in Base 3
(160−83, 160, 60)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (77, 160, 60)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 56, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (21, 104, 32)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (15, 56, 28)-net over F3, using
(160−83, 160, 84)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (77, 160, 84)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (71, 160, 84)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 71 and N(F) ≥ 84, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
(160−83, 160, 532)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (77, 160, 533)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (77, 159, 533)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 7618 932639 171878 670178 801985 860070 547492 104275 622995 005391 806990 126519 453195 > 3159 [i]