Best Known (89, 89+83, s)-Nets in Base 3
(89, 89+83, 69)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (89, 172, 69)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 62, 32)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 110, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (21, 62, 32)-net over F3, using
(89, 89+83, 97)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (89, 172, 97)-net over F3, using
(89, 89+83, 748)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (89, 172, 749)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (89, 171, 749)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 3892 163102 882772 425104 308600 535745 011612 543862 523334 967799 952888 073770 367836 307259 > 3171 [i]