Best Known (165, 165+84, s)-Nets in Base 3
(165, 165+84, 162)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (165, 249, 162)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (157, 249, 162)-net over F3, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (157, 250, 162)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (32, 125, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (32, 125, 81)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (157, 250, 162)-net over F3, using
(165, 165+84, 371)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (165, 249, 371)-net over F3, using
(165, 165+84, 5523)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (165, 249, 5524)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 64022 956953 925816 841526 381454 646545 042307 276169 882882 316291 040509 111670 728119 761334 653430 037742 182116 292236 489483 662361 > 3249 [i]