Best Known (129−87, 129, s)-Nets in Base 3
(129−87, 129, 42)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (42, 129, 42)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 129, 42)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 41)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 41)-sequence over F3, using
(129−87, 129, 56)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (42, 129, 56)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (40, 129, 56)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
(129−87, 129, 134)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (42, 129, 135)-net in base 3, because
- 7 times m-reduction [i] would yield (42, 122, 135)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3122, 135, S3, 80), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 1 310020 508637 620352 391208 095712 502073 964245 732475 093456 566329 / 65 > 3122 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3122, 135, S3, 80), but