Best Known (29, 29+9, s)-Nets in Base 3
(29, 29+9, 328)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 38, 328)-net over F3, using
- 32 times duplication [i] based on digital (27, 36, 328)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 9, 82)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
- the rational function field F81(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 9, 82)-net over F81, using
(29, 29+9, 556)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (29, 38, 556)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(338, 556, F3, 9) (dual of [556, 518, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(338, 743, F3, 9) (dual of [743, 705, 10]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,4]) ⊂ C([0,3]) [i] based on
- linear OA(337, 730, F3, 9) (dual of [730, 693, 10]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 730 | 312−1, defining interval I = [0,4], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−4,−3,…,4}|+1 = 10 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(325, 730, F3, 7) (dual of [730, 705, 8]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 730 | 312−1, defining interval I = [0,3], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−3,−2,…,3}|+1 = 8 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(31, 13, F3, 1) (dual of [13, 12, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(31, s, F3, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to C([0,4]) ⊂ C([0,3]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(338, 743, F3, 9) (dual of [743, 705, 10]-code), using
(29, 29+9, 28664)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 38, 28665)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 37, 28665)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 450327 647816 875921 > 337 [i]