Best Known (34, 34+90, s)-Nets in Base 3
(34, 34+90, 38)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 124, 38)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 124, 38)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 37)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 37)-sequence over F3, using
(34, 34+90, 46)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (34, 124, 46)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 124, 46)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 45)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 46, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 45)-sequence over F3, using
(34, 34+90, 111)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 124, 112)-net in base 3, because
- 24 times m-reduction [i] would yield (34, 100, 112)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3100, 112, S3, 66), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 337012 060714 431725 512045 406748 426703 296453 236034 239913 / 541025 > 3100 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3100, 112, S3, 66), but