Best Known (233−91, 233, s)-Nets in Base 3
(233−91, 233, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (142, 233, 156)-net over F3, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (142, 240, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 120, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 120, 78)-net over F9, using
(233−91, 233, 228)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (142, 233, 228)-net over F3, using
(233−91, 233, 2496)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (142, 233, 2497)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (142, 232, 2497)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 495 582337 868283 226334 227896 267969 298032 760132 577790 013828 278495 329862 612878 597939 648202 979797 686921 136491 886291 > 3232 [i]