Best Known (96, 96+92, s)-Nets in Base 3
(96, 96+92, 69)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 188, 69)-net over F3, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (96, 192, 69)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 69, 32)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 123, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (21, 69, 32)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(96, 96+92, 101)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (96, 188, 101)-net over F3, using
(96, 96+92, 757)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 188, 758)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 513091 716410 715525 492126 271144 131348 169313 523749 457535 537392 822895 432907 060378 406149 013957 > 3188 [i]