Best Known (105, 105+93, s)-Nets in Base 3
(105, 105+93, 75)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (105, 198, 75)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (27, 73, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (32, 125, 38)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 37)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 37)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 73, 37)-net over F3, using
(105, 105+93, 118)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (105, 198, 118)-net over F3, using
(105, 105+93, 949)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (105, 198, 950)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (105, 197, 950)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 9993 178219 121934 834752 099016 393856 017314 521313 699894 383421 274205 967239 003886 234917 922414 012997 > 3197 [i]