MinT - Best Known (89, 89+93, s)-Nets in Base 3

Best Known (89, 89+93, s)-Nets in Base 3

(89, 89+93, 65)-Net over F₃ — Constructive and digital

Digital (89, 182, 65)-net over F₃, using

1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (89, 183, 65)-net over F₃, using
- (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
  1. digital (15, 62, 28)-net over F₃, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F₃, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃ with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
        an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
  2. digital (27, 121, 37)-net over F₃, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F₃, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ III based on the algebraic function field F/F₃ with g(F)Â =Â 26, N(F)Â =Â 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F₃ with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(89, 89+93, 96)-Net over F₃ — Digital

Digital (89, 182, 96)-net over F₃, using

net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F₃, using
- Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃ with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
  - algebraic function fields over â„¤₃ by Niederreiter/Xing [i]

(89, 89+93, 634)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s

There is no (89, 182, 635)-net in base 3, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (89, 181, 635)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3^mÂ â‰¥ 240 366675 390995 410804 710221 253950 187372 029193 485650 530828 900218 614318 440109 974559 616061 > 3¹⁸¹ [i]