Best Known (96, 96+94, s)-Nets in Base 3
(96, 96+94, 69)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 190, 69)-net over F3, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (96, 192, 69)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 69, 32)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 123, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (21, 69, 32)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(96, 96+94, 99)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (96, 190, 99)-net over F3, using
(96, 96+94, 734)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 190, 735)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 4 722311 283134 377829 682516 322195 190036 172167 498262 950804 824551 396712 532146 532999 394234 057507 > 3190 [i]