Best Known (186−96, 186, s)-Nets in Base 3
(186−96, 186, 65)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (90, 186, 65)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 63, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 123, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (15, 63, 28)-net over F3, using
(186−96, 186, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (90, 186, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 186, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(186−96, 186, 615)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (90, 186, 616)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 57662 317388 983941 205658 097252 725880 269868 916762 839375 606994 913572 440381 675511 002346 122241 > 3186 [i]