Best Known (192−97, 192, s)-Nets in Base 3
(192−97, 192, 68)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (95, 192, 68)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 69, 32)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (26, 123, 36)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (21, 69, 32)-net over F3, using
(192−97, 192, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (95, 192, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 192, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(192−97, 192, 695)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (95, 192, 696)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (95, 191, 696)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 13 888367 970469 019875 494890 715223 197186 780822 493535 532671 206631 491819 143501 490933 389397 127169 > 3191 [i]