Best Known (145−98, 145, s)-Nets in Base 3
(145−98, 145, 48)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (47, 145, 48)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 145, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
(145−98, 145, 56)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (47, 145, 56)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (40, 145, 56)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
(145−98, 145, 148)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (47, 145, 149)-net in base 3, because
- 9 times m-reduction [i] would yield (47, 136, 149)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3136, 149, S3, 89), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 6 385896 362423 839893 456186 755923 270794 744764 572661 578917 513381 685836 804369 / 75 686875 > 3136 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3136, 149, S3, 89), but