Best Known (4, 10, s)-Nets in Base 3
(4, 10, 19)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (4, 10, 19)-net over F3, using
(4, 10, 27)-Net over F3 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (4, 10, 28)-net over F3, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(310, 28, F3, 6) (dual of [28, 18, 7]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- linear OA(39, 16, F3, 6) (dual of [16, 7, 7]-code), but
- “vE2†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- linear OA(318, 28, F3, 12) (dual of [28, 10, 13]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(36, 15, F3, 4) (dual of [15, 9, 5]-code), but
- “vE2†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(36, 15, F3, 4) (dual of [15, 9, 5]-code), but
- linear OA(39, 16, F3, 6) (dual of [16, 7, 7]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
(4, 10, 32)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (4, 10, 33)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 59291 > 310 [i]