Best Known (38, 104, s)-Nets in Base 3
(38, 104, 38)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (38, 104, 38)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 104, 38)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 37)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 37)-sequence over F3, using
(38, 104, 52)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (38, 104, 52)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (37, 104, 52)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 51)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 37 and N(F) ≥ 52, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 51)-sequence over F3, using
(38, 104, 129)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (38, 104, 130)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (38, 103, 130)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3103, 130, S3, 65), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 245 717769 990125 080884 183592 612860 937940 609304 274570 786762 609437 / 17 549689 290749 > 3103 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3103, 130, S3, 65), but