Best Known (30, 129, s)-Nets in Base 3
(30, 129, 37)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 129, 37)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (27, 129, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
(30, 129, 42)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (30, 129, 42)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (29, 129, 42)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 41)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 29 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 41)-sequence over F3, using
(30, 129, 98)-Net over F3 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (30, 129, 99)-net over F3, because
- 36 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (30, 93, 99)-net over F3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(393, 99, F3, 63) (dual of [99, 6, 64]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(330, 35, F3, 21) (dual of [35, 5, 22]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(39, 13, F3, 7) (dual of [13, 4, 8]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(38, 12, F3, 6) (dual of [12, 4, 7]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(39, 13, F3, 7) (dual of [13, 4, 8]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(330, 35, F3, 21) (dual of [35, 5, 22]-code), but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(393, 99, F3, 63) (dual of [99, 6, 64]-code), but
(30, 129, 99)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 129, 100)-net in base 3, because
- 41 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 88, 100)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(388, 100, S3, 58), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 19088 056323 407827 075424 486287 615602 692670 648963 / 19057 > 388 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(388, 100, S3, 58), but