Best Known (46, 129, s)-Nets in Base 3
(46, 129, 48)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 129, 48)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 129, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
(46, 129, 56)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (46, 129, 56)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (40, 129, 56)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
(46, 129, 148)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 129, 149)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (46, 128, 149)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3128, 149, S3, 82), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 33 761969 841965 313899 084622 936677 465357 394104 583425 843880 075496 568722 581771 / 1 948280 920300 > 3128 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3128, 149, S3, 82), but