Best Known (86, 159, s)-Nets in Base 3
(86, 159, 69)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 159, 69)-net over F3, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (86, 162, 69)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 59, 32)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 103, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (21, 59, 32)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(86, 159, 104)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (86, 159, 104)-net over F3, using
(86, 159, 851)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 159, 852)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (86, 158, 852)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2456 837565 135313 521957 037697 410390 056494 893490 591239 516990 723897 513619 644225 > 3158 [i]